California AG Jerry Brown urges courts to overturn Prop 8 on eve of hearing
activism, general, lgbt, politics, religion Add comments (2)
California Attorney General Jerry Brown, who has asked that the courts overturn Proposition 8, writes in the Huffington Post on the eve of the hearing.
The case touches the heart of our democracy and poses a profound question: can a bare majority of voters strip away an inalienable right through the initiative process? If so, what possible meaning does the word inalienable have?
…
Fundamental rights in California are recognized and protected by our constitution, which declares in Article I, Section 1 that “all people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights” and “among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.”
These fundamental premises of a free people were declared when the constitution was first adopted. The initiative process came much later in 1911, when the immediate concern was to give the people power over the railroads, which were seen as having a stranglehold over the legislature. In creating this initiative process, there was no discussion or any evidence of intent to permit a simple majority of voters to take away the pre-existing rights deemed inalienable by Article I.
In 2008, the California Supreme Court was faced with the question of how the values enshrined in Article I apply to same sex marriages. It concluded that the concept of “liberty” includes the right to form the enduring relationship called marriage and that no compelling interest justified denying this right to same sex couples. Just like the right to be free from discrimination in housing, citizens have the right to be free from discrimination in state-granted marriage licenses.
With this Supreme Court decision, same sex marriage has the protection of Article 1 and, like other inalienable rights, cannot be taken away by a popular vote — whether it be 52% (as was the case in Proposition 8 ) or 65% (as it was for Proposition 14).
I believe, therefore, the Court must conclude as I have that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional and should be stricken.
Oral arguments begin at 9am PST on Thursday, March 5, and can be viewed online here.
Meanwhile Catholics for the Common Good are urging their flock to pray and fast to uphold Proposition 8.
Vigils supporting marriage equality will be taking place throughout the state tonight. Visit www.eveofjustice.com for more information.











March 4th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
The tyranny of the majority. And a TINY majority it was. Our constitution was not meant to be abused as it is currently. I won’t be at any vigils in person (evil 100+ fever!) but my spirit joins you in your call to justice, equality and liberty! Thanks so much Elvis, for keeping this in the front of my mind!
If the catholics can fast and pray, can we not fast and send powerful energies and/or pray in our OWN way? Of course, fasting is not a problem with the flu… I can barely tolerate weak tea right now…
OK, I think I’ve begun to babble… Keep us posted!
March 4th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
This is the exact argument I made a few weeks/months ago. Let’s imagine that men made up 51% of the population of California and got enough signatures to start a proposition X to remove Women’s right to vote, and all 51% voted for it, carrying the proposition. Should that proposition really be allowed to remove Women’s right to vote? If that were the case, any majority could remove rights from any minority. That is inherently wrong.